Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1848 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-7100T - 143 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $40.69 vs $56.15
- Up to 23% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-12100F - $0.34 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
77%
Price, €
€62.33
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €62.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
133
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |