Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-7100T - 263 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $43.94 vs $285.89
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.2 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
17%
Price, €
€317.34
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €317.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
238
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
170 W | TDP | 35 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
47.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |