Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1115G4 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1115G4 is 3248 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1115G4
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-6100 - 153 vs 144 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1115G4 - 6 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1115G4 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |