Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2860 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 35 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Celeron B820 - 193 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |