Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 v3 outperforms Pentium Gold G6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 v3 is 2061 days older than Pentium Gold G6400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 58 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium Gold G6400 - 500 vs 485 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Pentium Gold | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
