Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 851 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron 3205U - 197 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 64 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Broadwell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
