Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3494 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of FX-9370
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $172.08 vs $604.65
- Up to 62% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.62 vs $4.30 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 32% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-9370 - 156 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 120 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €191.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.3/FPS
38%
Price, €
€671.16
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9370 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |