Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3395 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of FX-9370
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $172.08 vs $405.00
- Up to 29% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.42 vs $0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 69% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9370 - 761 vs 451 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 170 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €191.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
761
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
71%
Price, €
€449.55
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €449.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9370 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |