Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2256 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of FX-8370
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $163.06 vs $309.90
- Up to 36% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.51 vs $0.80 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 20% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8370 - 385 vs 320 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8370 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 32 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €163.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6847 minutes ago
Buy for €309.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6848 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8370 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |