Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2620 days newer than the cheaper FX-8370.
Advantages of FX-8370
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $163.06 vs $251.35
- Up to 17% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900K - $0.97 vs $1.17 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8370 - 214 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8370 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €163.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7029 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
83%
Price, €
€251.35
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7029 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8370 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |