The FX-8320E is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Pentium Gold G6405 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $80.20 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320E
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Pentium Gold G6405
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 50% cheaper – $80.18 vs $160.38
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
FX-8320E vs Pentium Gold G6405 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Pentium Gold G6405
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
175
100%
Min 1% FPS
117
100%
Price, €
€80.18
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
FX-8320E vs Pentium Gold G6405 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320E vs Pentium Gold G6405 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320E vs Pentium Gold G6405 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320E
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
70%
Pentium Gold G6405
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320E | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium Gold G6405 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| $147.00 | MSRP | $64.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
