Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive FX-8320E on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1769 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320E.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 152% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320E - 58 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than FX-8320E - $84.68 vs $160.38
- Up to 79% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320E - $1.46 vs $6.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8320E - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320E - 12 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €160.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7105 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7106 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320E | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |