Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $91.91 vs $341.19
- Up to 63% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.13 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 43% better in Valorant than FX-8320 - 978 vs 684 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €91.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7184 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
978
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
37%
Price, €
€341.19
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7184 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |