Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $82.80 vs $219.10
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.40 vs $0.94 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-8320 - 258 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €91.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
43%
Price, €
€243.2
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €243.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |