The FX-8320 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G6950, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $57.74 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G6950
- Up to 63% cheaper – $34.17 vs $91.91
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 73 vs 125 Watts
FX-8320 vs Pentium G6950 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Pentium G6950
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
164
98%
Min 1% FPS
111
99%
Price, €
€34.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
FX-8320 vs Pentium G6950 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Pentium G6950 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Pentium G6950 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Pentium G6950
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G6950 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $169.00 | MSRP | $87.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Vishera | Codename | Clarkdale |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1066 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
