The FX-8320 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-7900X, however, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $200.88 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 69% cheaper – $91.91 vs $292.79
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-7900X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-7900X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
FX-8320 vs Core i9-7900X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-7900X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€292.79
31%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
35%
FX-8320 vs Core i9-7900X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Core i9-7900X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
57%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7900X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
14 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
$169.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
125 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 14 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |