Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2825 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 13% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $73.89 vs $84.68
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 21% better in New World than FX-8150 - 119 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing New World than FX-8150 - $0.71 vs $0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €73.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.68
87%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |