Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3312 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $73.89 vs $108.01
- Up to 13% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 5600X - $0.49 vs $0.56 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 27% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8150 - 192 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €73.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6777 minutes ago
Buy for €108.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6777 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |