The FX-8150 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3300X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $53.12 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 42% cheaper – $73.89 vs $127.01
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3300X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 3 3300X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
212
100%
Min 1% FPS
147
100%
Price, €
€127.01
58%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
66%
FX-8150 vs Ryzen 3 3300X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 3 3300X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Ryzen 3 3300X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
98%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1.20 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
