Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4388 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of FX-8150
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $66.57 vs $338.41
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-14900KF - $0.20 vs $0.75 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 35% better in Battlefield IV than FX-8150 - 499 vs 370 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €73.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1236 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
499
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
27%
Price, €
€375.64
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €375.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1235 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8150 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |