The FX-8150 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-6600T and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $88.22 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 54% cheaper – $73.89 vs $162.11
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-6600T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
FX-8150 vs Core i5-6600T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
855
100%
Min 1% FPS
462
100%
Price, €
€162.11
45%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
50%
FX-8150 vs Core i5-6600T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i5-6600T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i5-6600T in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-6600T
Jul 2nd, 2015
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-6600T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $2.13 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
