The FX-8150 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-10105 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $2.67 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-8150
- Up to 3% cheaper – $73.89 vs $76.56
Advantages of the Core i3-10105
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
FX-8150 vs Core i3-10105 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
187
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€76.56
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
FX-8150 vs Core i3-10105 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8150 vs Core i3-10105 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8150 vs Core i3-10105 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
89%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8150 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |