The FX-6350 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-9920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the FX-6350
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 125 vs 165 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-9920X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 6 threads
FX-6350 vs Core i9-9920X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
FX-6350 vs Core i9-9920X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6350 vs Core i9-9920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6350 vs Core i9-9920X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
42%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9920X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1,189.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
125 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 19.25 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |