Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 1439 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Core i9-9920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9920X - 212 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $159.89 vs $243.61
- Up to 46% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-9920X - $0.84 vs $1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 105 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €270.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€177.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €177.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9920X | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |