The FX-6300 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2699A v4, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $1659.44 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 97% cheaper – $52.27 vs $1711.71
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 34% less energy – 95 vs 145 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Xeon E5-2699A v4 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 44 vs 6 threads
FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
181
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, €
€1711.71
3%
Value, €/FPS
€9.45/FPS
3%
FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
27%
L3 Cache
8 MB
15%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Vishera | Codename | Broadwell |
95 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 22 |
6 | Threads | 44 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 55 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |