The FX-6300 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3300X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $74.75 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6300
- Up to 59% cheaper – $52.27 vs $127.02
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Ryzen 3 3300X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3300X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
FX-6300 vs Ryzen 3 3300X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€127.02
41%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
47%
FX-6300 vs Ryzen 3 3300X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 3 3300X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6300 vs Ryzen 3 3300X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
58%
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6300 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
$132.00 | MSRP | $120.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |