Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $52.27 vs $390.09
- Up to 75% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-14900K - $0.43 vs $1.70 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 89% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6300 - 229 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €52.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7456 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
25%
Price, €
€390.09
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7455 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |