Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $52.27 vs $279.28
- Up to 81% better value when playing Control than Core i7-13700K - $0.26 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than FX-6300 - 208 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €52.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7493 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.34/FPS
19%
Price, €
€279.28
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7493 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |