The FX-6100 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-7920X, however, it's a better value for money, as it's $103.92 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 80% cheaper – $26.71 vs $130.63
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 95 vs 140 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-7920X cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Advantages of the Core i9-7920X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 6 threads
FX-6100 vs Core i9-7920X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€130.63
20%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
23%
FX-6100 vs Core i9-7920X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Core i9-7920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Core i9-7920X in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
48%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16.5 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
