The FX-4130 is a clear winner – it's a much faster gaming CPU than the Phenom II X4 820 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $3.60 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-4130
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Phenom II X4 820
- Up to 8% cheaper – $43.26 vs $46.86
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
FX-4130 vs Phenom II X4 820 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Phenom II X4 820
Sep 1st, 2009
Average FPS
164
99%
Min 1% FPS
111
99%
Price, €
€43.26
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
FX-4130 vs Phenom II X4 820 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Phenom II X4 820 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Phenom II X4 820 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Phenom II X4 820
Sep 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
71%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Phenom II X4 820 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
| $112.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Deneb |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
