The FX-4130 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-6700T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $48.91 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 51% cheaper – $46.86 vs $95.77
Advantages of the Core i7-6700T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
FX-4130 vs Core i7-6700T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€95.77
48%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
54%
FX-4130 vs Core i7-6700T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Core i7-6700T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Core i7-6700T in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Core i7-6700T
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
$112.00 | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
