The FX-4130 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-6300 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $51.07 cheaper!
Advantages of the FX-4130
- Up to 52% cheaper – $46.86 vs $97.93
Advantages of the Core i3-6300
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
FX-4130 vs Core i3-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, €
€97.93
47%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
53%
FX-4130 vs Core i3-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-4130 vs Core i3-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-4130 vs Core i3-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-4130
Aug 27th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-4130 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
$112.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
125 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1866 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |