Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms EPYC 7713 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 561 days newer than EPYC 7713.
Advantages of EPYC 7713
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than EPYC 7713 - 195 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD EPYC 7713 - 170 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7713 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€446.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €446.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7765 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7713 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |