Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms EPYC 7713 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 561 days newer than EPYC 7713.
Advantages of EPYC 7713
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-13700K - 128 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 34% better in Dirt 5 than EPYC 7713 - 255 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD EPYC 7713 - 125 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7713 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€279.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7752 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7713 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 16 |
128 | Threads | 24 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |