Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9940X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 634 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9940X.
Advantages of Core i9-9940X
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 165 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i9-9940X - 229 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $1220.72 vs $1251.24
- Up to 4% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-9940X - $5.33 vs $5.54 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9940X - 64 vs 28 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,251.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 226 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1220.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,220.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9940X | vs | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 32 |
28 | Threads | 64 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |