Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1824 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9920X.
Advantages of Core i9-9920X
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $243.61 vs $338.78
- Up to 24% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-14900KF - $1.70 vs $2.24 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-9920X - 168 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
159
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€270.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €270.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.24/FPS
76%
Price, €
€376.05
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for €376.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9920X | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |