Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900X.
Advantages of Core i9-9900X
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $284.07 vs $730.45
- Up to 58% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-13400F - $0.89 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i9-9900X - 383 vs 353 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
353
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€315.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €315.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |