Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-10400F - 414 vs 350 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $60.37 vs $393.64
- Up to 82% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-14900F - $0.19 vs $1.06 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
414
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
18%
Price, €
€436.94
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €436.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1377 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
350
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €67.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1379 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |