Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-13100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-13100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 369 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-13100.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 26% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-13100 - 201 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i3-13100
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $112.60 vs $436.94
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-14900F - $0.71 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
33%
Price, €
€436.94
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €436.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6453 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
159
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €112.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6454 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 60 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |