The Core i9-13900KS is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $423.73 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-13900KS
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 94% cheaper – $26.71 vs $450.44
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 37% less energy – 95 vs 150 Watts
Core i9-13900KS vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Average FPS
224
100%
Min 1% FPS
147
100%
Price, €
€450.44
5%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
8%
Core i9-13900KS vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900KS vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900KS vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900KS
Jan 12th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-13900KS | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $699.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| 150 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
