Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-13900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-13900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 468 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-13900K.
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $453.06 vs $461.97
- Up to 1% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900F - $3.26 vs $3.30 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-13900K - 140 vs 139 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
139
99%
Value, €/FPS
€3.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€453.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €453.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 338 minutes ago
Buy for €461.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 340 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900K | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |