Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 365 days older than the more expensive Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Core i5-13400F - 470 vs 458 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $292.18 vs $730.45
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-13400F - $0.69 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
470
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€324.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €324.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900F | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |