Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 9 5950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900F is 425 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 9 5950X.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Starfield than Ryzen 9 5950X - 77 vs 71 FPS
- Up to 4% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 5950X - $4.21 vs $4.38 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $280.01 vs $292.18
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900F - 32 vs 24 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
77
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€324.32
95%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €324.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Buy for €310.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900F | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |