Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F and the cheaper Core i5-12400 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-12400 - 183 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $116.52 vs $292.18
- Up to 59% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-12900F - $0.73 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
41%
Price, €
€324.32
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €324.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
176
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €129.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900F | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |