Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 and the cheaper Core i5-12400F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 4% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-12400F - 130 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $99.65 vs $371.17
- Up to 72% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-12900 - $0.80 vs $2.86 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €371.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3569 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
125
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3569 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900 | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |