Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1173 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900X.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 31% better in Starfield than Core i9-10900X - 80 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $432.43 vs $509.01
- Up to 35% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900X - $5.41 vs $8.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €509.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
80
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€432.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €432.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900X | vs | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Cascade Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |