In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900KF is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 3600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 8% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
Ryzen 5 3600
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 5 3600: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
83 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
91%
Price, $
$73.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 5 3600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 5 3600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
62%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
92%
Ryzen 5 3600
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
60%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600 Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $509.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
