In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900KF is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900KF
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 125 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
- Up to 99% faster in Battlefield 6 – 179 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 99% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
179 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
134 FPS
100%
Price, $
$679.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900KF vs Ryzen 9 9950X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
62%
L3 Cache
20 MB
16%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
52%
Ryzen 9 9950X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 6th, 2025 |
$509.00 | MSRP | $699.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM5 |
125 W | Power Consumption | 170 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
