The Core i9-10900 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $301.59 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-10900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 77% cheaper – $91.91 vs $393.50
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Core i9-10900 vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€393.5
23%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
27%
Core i9-10900 vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900 vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900 vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-10900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $483.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
20 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
