In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900 is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 88 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900 vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900 vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$483.00 | MSRP | $509.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
